Gamayun Dallas

[trigger warning: rape culture, entitlement] You want to say Hi to the cute girl on the subway. How will she react? Fortunately, I can tell you with some certainty, because she’s already sending messages to you. Looking out the window, reading a book, working on a computer, arms folded across chest, body away from you = do not disturb. So, y’know, don’t disturb her. Really. Even to say that you like her hair, shoes, or book. A compliment is not always a reason for women to smile and say thank you. You are a threat, remember? You are Schrödinger’s Rapist. Don’t assume that whatever you have to say will win her over with charm or flattery. Believe what she’s signaling, and back off.

If you speak, and she responds in a monosyllabic way without looking at you, she’s saying, “I don’t want to be rude, but please leave me alone.” You don’t know why. It could be “Please leave me alone because I am trying to memorize Beowulf.” It could be “Please leave me alone because you are a scary, scary man with breath like a water buffalo.” It could be “Please leave me alone because I am planning my assassination of a major geopolitical figure and I will have to kill you if you are able to recognize me and blow my cover.”

On the other hand, if she is turned towards you, making eye contact, and she responds in a friendly and talkative manner when you speak to her, you are getting a green light. You can continue the conversation until you start getting signals to back off.

The fourth point: If you fail to respect what women say, you label yourself a problem.

There’s a man with whom I went out on a single date—afternoon coffee, for one hour by the clock—on July 25th. In the two days after the date, he sent me about fifteen e-mails, scolding me for non-responsiveness. I e-mailed him back, saying, “Look, this is a disproportionate response to a single date. You are making me uncomfortable. Do not contact me again.” It is now October 7th. Does he still e-mail?

Yeah. He does. About every two weeks.

This man scores higher on the threat level scale than Man with the Cockroach Tattoos. (Who, after all, is guilty of nothing more than terrifying bad taste.) You see, Mr. E-mail has made it clear that he ignores what I say when he wants something from me. Now, I don’t know if he is an actual rapist, and I sincerely hope he’s not. But he is certainly Schrödinger’s Rapist, and this particular Schrödinger’s Rapist has a probability ratio greater than one in sixty. Because a man who ignores a woman’s NO in a non-sexual setting is more likely to ignore NO in a sexual setting, as well.

So if you speak to a woman who is otherwise occupied, you’re sending a subtle message. It is that your desire to interact trumps her right to be left alone. If you pursue a conversation when she’s tried to cut it off, you send a message. It is that your desire to speak trumps her right to be left alone. And each of those messages indicates that you believe your desires are a legitimate reason to override her rights.

For women, who are watching you very closely to determine how much of a threat you are, this is an important piece of data.

an excerpt from Phaedra Starling’s “Schrödinger’s Rapist: or a guy’s guide to approaching strange women without being maced” (via lostgrrrls)

important things think about.

(via honeymoonlover)

Excellent advice for the dudely types.

(via rainbowfairyprincess)

(via yamino)

ryking:

uncdan:

aatombomb:

c-newt:

Saw this on my facebook news feed.
I’m officially over people.

They want to teach children how to shoot at Bibles? Works for me.

Kind of on the same level as burning Korans, isn’t it? 

Hmmm… I don’t think so. I don’t believe (although I could be wrong) that Christians view Bibles as being that sacred. I’ve known Christians who dog-ear Bible pages, highlight Biblical passages, or scribble notes in the page margins. I’m not sure Muslims could do those things with the Koran without being killed if discovered (although again I could be wrong). Then there’s the difference between a joke about shooting Bibles and actually engaging in book burning, in particular burning a book for the sole purpose of inciting a religion’s more extreme members to violence. — Ryking

Going to Catholic school and having so much of my education based on the bible is one of the main reasons I have stepped so far away from my upbringing. In fact, most kids raised this way take much the same route. Want to ensure your kids will never take christianity seriously? Make it a required class in high school.
Every religion class I ever had to take was twisted to fit the teacher’s personal opinions. I’ve had teachers who told me the only business women have is raising children and taking care of the home. I’ve had teachers who claimed the Crusades never happened. (yeah…stick that in your pipe and smoke it.) I’ve had teachers who condemned reading Harry Potter and Lord of the Rings and in the same breath sang the praises of C.S. Lewis and the Chronicles of Narnia. 
I think the big mistake here is putting precedence on just the bible in schools, when really we should be teaching kids to form their own opinions about ALL religious/spiritual/moral beliefs and NEVER STOP cultivating those opinions. 
In my opinion complacency=ignorance
And…then there were guns…bringing a gun to the bible fight. Sounds like a party.

ryking:

uncdan:

aatombomb:

c-newt:

Saw this on my facebook news feed.

I’m officially over people.

They want to teach children how to shoot at Bibles? Works for me.

Kind of on the same level as burning Korans, isn’t it? 

Hmmm… I don’t think so. I don’t believe (although I could be wrong) that Christians view Bibles as being that sacred. I’ve known Christians who dog-ear Bible pages, highlight Biblical passages, or scribble notes in the page margins. I’m not sure Muslims could do those things with the Koran without being killed if discovered (although again I could be wrong). Then there’s the difference between a joke about shooting Bibles and actually engaging in book burning, in particular burning a book for the sole purpose of inciting a religion’s more extreme members to violence. — Ryking

Going to Catholic school and having so much of my education based on the bible is one of the main reasons I have stepped so far away from my upbringing. In fact, most kids raised this way take much the same route. Want to ensure your kids will never take christianity seriously? Make it a required class in high school.

Every religion class I ever had to take was twisted to fit the teacher’s personal opinions. I’ve had teachers who told me the only business women have is raising children and taking care of the home. I’ve had teachers who claimed the Crusades never happened. (yeah…stick that in your pipe and smoke it.) I’ve had teachers who condemned reading Harry Potter and Lord of the Rings and in the same breath sang the praises of C.S. Lewis and the Chronicles of Narnia. 

I think the big mistake here is putting precedence on just the bible in schools, when really we should be teaching kids to form their own opinions about ALL religious/spiritual/moral beliefs and NEVER STOP cultivating those opinions. 

In my opinion complacency=ignorance

And…then there were guns…bringing a gun to the bible fight. Sounds like a party.

(via diadoumenos)

adversity introduces man to himself